JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)March 18, 1998Full bench

C-085 de 1998

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Fabio Morón Díaz

✓Claimant Hidelbrando Ortiz Lozano

✓
Topic · hard data
Ley 273/96. Por La Cual Se Modifica El Reglamento Del Congreso En Cuanto Al Juzgamiento De Altos Funcionarios. Exequible. Ver <a Href=../1997/C-148-97.Rtf> C-148/97</A>
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Comision De Investigacion Y Acusacion
  • Representación del Ministerio Público corresponde al Procurador
Procurador General De La Nacion
  • Casos en que se exige actuación directa son taxativos
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 273/96. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. En lo relacionado con los artículos 1, 2, 3 y 4 de la ley 273 de 1996, ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO en la Sentencia C-148 de 1997.
  2. Segundo. Declarar EXEQUIBLE el artículo 5 de la ley 273 de 1996, en el entendido de que para los casos a los que se refiere dicha norma, la representación del Ministerio Público le corresponderá directamente al Procurador General de la Nación, tal como lo ordena el artículo 278-2 de la C.P.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
ConcurrenceJosé Gregorio Hernández Galindo
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.