JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)January 24, 2001Full bench

C-057 de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Martha Victoria Sáchica Méndez

✓Claimant Jaime Enrique Lozano

✓
Topic · hard data
Sala Disciplinaria Del Consejo Seccional De La Judicatura. Colisión De Competencia Entre Jueces O Fiscales E Inspectores De Policía
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Libertad De Configuracion Legislativa
  • Funcionario a resolver colisión de competencias
Corte Suprema De Justicia
  • Resolución de colisión de competencias
Debido Proceso
  • Colisión de competencias
Juez Penal Del Circuito
  • Colisión de competencias entre jueces y fiscales
  • Resolución de colisión de competencias
Sala Disciplinaria Del Consejo Seccional De La Judicatura
  • Colisión de competencia entre jueces o fiscales e inspectores de policía
Sala Disciplinaria Del Consejo Superior De La Judicatura
  • Resolución de colisión de competencias
11 topics · 12 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Ley 228 de 1995.

Art. 34.

Contravenciones especiales.

Competencia para resolver conflictos entre jueces o fiscales e inspectores de policia.

Inhibida y exequible.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 228/95. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 34Ley 228/95UPHELD
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. Declárase INHIBIDA para conocer del segmento del artículo 34 de la Ley 228 de 1995, que corresponde a las expresiones "entre autoridades de policía y entre fiscales o", por la derogación tácita que del mismo hiciera el artículo 114, numeral 3 de la Ley 270 de 1996.
  2. Segundo. Decláranse EXEQUIBLES las expresiones del artículo 34 de la Ley 228 de 1995, "Todo conflicto de competencias que se suscite (...) entre fiscales y jueces, será resuelto por los jueces del circuito del lugar donde se cometió el hecho."
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.