JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)February 3, 1994Full bench

C-038 de 1994

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice José Gregorio Hernández Galindo

✓Claimant Cesar Osorio

✓
Topic · hard data
Dec. 1817/64. Art. 56 Lit. H. Y 206 Parcial. Func. De Directores De Establec. Carcelario. Lectura De Correspondencia. Sent. Inhibitoria.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 1405/34. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

On the entire provisionLey 1405/34DECLINED TO RULE
Art. 206Decreto 1817/64DECLINED TO RULE
Art. 56Decreto 1817/64DECLINED TO RULE
3 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. RESUELVE:
  3. Declárase INHIBIDA para proferir fallo de mérito en lo que respecta a la demanda de inconstitucionalidad instaurada contra los artículos 56, literal h), y 206 (parcial) del Decreto 1817 de 1964, por carencia actual de objeto.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.