JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)January 20, 2004Full bench

C-023 de 2004

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alfredo Beltrán Sierra

✓Claimant Alfredo Castaño Martinez

✓
Topic · hard data
Fusion De Entidades U Organismos Nacionales-Régimen Laboral Serán Los De La Absorbente
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Control De Constitucionalidad
  • Incompetencia para modificar sentido de una norma
Fusion De Entidades U Organismos Nacionales
  • Régimen laboral será de la absorbente
  • Régimen laboral será de la absorbente siempre que tengan la misma naturaleza jurídica
Cosa Juzgada Constitucional
  • Régimen laboral en fusión de entidades u organismos nacionales
Derechos Adquiridos Del Trabajador
  • No variación de naturaleza jurídica del vínculo laboral
Sentencia De Constitucionalidad
  • No modificación de una norma
5 topics · 6 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Ley 790 de 2002.

Art. 2 parag. 1 (p.).

Renovacion de la administracion publica.

Fusion de entidades u organismos nacionales y de ministerios.

Regimen laboral de servidores publicos de entidad absorbente.

Compensacion salarios y prestaciones.

Facultades extraordinarias

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 790/02. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. ESTESE a lo resuelto en la sentencia C-880 del
  2. primero. (1) de octubre de 2003, que declaro exequible la expresion "y el regimen laboral de sus servidores publicos" contenida en el paragrafo 1deg del articulo 2deg, de la Ley 790 de 2002, en el entendido que el trabajador a quien se le ofrece continuar en la entidad que resulte de la fusion, tiene la opcion de recibir una compensacion por los salarios y prestaciones que no percibira en el nuevo regimen de la entidad absorbente, o a integrarse al nuevo regimen sin ser desmejorado en los aspectos salariales y prestacionales
  3. Notifiquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available3
ConcurrenceAlfredo Beltrán SierraConcurrenceAlvaro Tafur GalvisConcurrenceJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.