JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)December 3, 2018

A- de 2018

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Luis Guillermo Guerrero Pérez

✓Claimant Maria Emma Arbelaez De Moreno

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Solicitud De Aclaración Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Negar por cuanto no existe una razón objetiva de duda, sino inconformidad y deseo de reabrir el debate jurídico
Aclaracion O Adicion Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Procedencia excepcional dentro del término de ejecutoria
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de aclaración de la Sentencia T-587A/12.

La petición formulada por la accionante está encaminada a que la Sala Tercera de Revisión aclare y adicione el fallo de la referencia, de modo que en su parte resolutiva emita una orden adicional relacionada con el pago del retroactivo pensional al que considera tener derecho.

Luego de encontrar que la memorialista acude por tercera vez a la Corte pretendiendo reabrir un debate ya concluido para solicitar que se emita un nuevo pronunciamiento respecto de la misma pretensión, la Sala decidió ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO en el Auto 261/14.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO en el Auto 261 de 2014, proferido por la Sala Tercera de Revision, en el que se rechazo por extemporanea la solicitud de aclaracion y adicion de la sentencia T-587A de 2012, formulada por Maria Emma Arbelaez de Moreno.
  2. SEGUNDO. COMUNIQUESE el presente auto a la peticionaria, advirtiendose que contra esta decision no procede ningun recurso.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.