JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)October 29, 2018

A- de 2018

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Gloria Stella Ortiz Delgado

✓Claimant Carlos Garzon Garcia Y Otra

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Corte Constitucional
  • Competencia para darle efectos “Inter Pares” e “inter comunis” a sus providencias
Adicion De Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Requisitos de procedencia excepcional
4 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

El apoderado judicial de los accionantes solicitó a la Corporación extender los efectos de la Sentencia T-356/18 a todas las personas que se encontraran en las mismas condiciones que ellos y a las restantes 207 personas que adquirieron el inmueble en el mismo acto de prescripción adquisitiva en el que lo lograron sus mandantes.

La Corte considera que la petición formulada desconoce las excepcionales circunstancias en las que el juez puede modificar la sentencia luego de dictada.

Consecuentemente con lo anterior, decide RECHAZAR el requerimiento formulado.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. De acuerdo con las consideraciones expuestas, RECHAZAR la solicitud de adicion de la Sentencia T-356 de 2018, formulada por Carlos Garzon Garcia y Luz Marina Perez, a traves de apoderado.
  2. SEGUNDO. COMUNICAR la presente providencia a los peticionarios con la advertencia que contra esta decision no procede ningun recurso.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.