A- de 2017
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Carlos Libardo Bernal Pulido
✓Claimant Ana Lucia Parra Vera
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Condiciones formales y materiales
- Casos en los que se considera que los Magistrados no incurren en la causal de haber conceptuado
- Denegada al no configurarse ninguna causal
- Causales taxativas
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Recusación formulada en contra de la doctora Diana Fajardo Rivera.
La memorialista adujo que la magistrada en mención incurrió en la causal consagrada en el artículo 25 del Decreto Ley 2067 de 1991, esto es, haber conceptuado sobre la constitucionalidad de la disposición acusada.
La Corte decide RECHAZAR la recusación invocada, por falta de pertinencia.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- Primero. RECHAZAR por falta de pertinencia la solicitud presentada por la parte demandante en contra de la senora Magistrada Diana Fajardo Rivera dentro del expediente D-12249.
- Segundo. Contra esta providencia no procede recurso alguno.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.