A- de 2017
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Luis Guillermo Guerrero Pérez
✓Claimant Alexander Mateus Rodriguez
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Presentación de demanda que ya había sido rechazada
- No configura vulneración de derechos fundamentales
- Improcedencia por cuanto el recurso de súplica no presenta argumentos que desvirtúen las razones constitutivas del rechazo de la demanda
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Recurso de súplica interpuesto en contra del auto que rechazó la demanda de inconstitucionalidad de la referencia.
La Sala Plena de la Corporación decide CONFIRMAR en su integridad la providencia recurrida.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR en su integridad el Auto del 5 de octubre de 2017 proferido por el magistrado Carlos Bernal Pulido, mediante el cual se rechazo la demanda interpuesta por el ciudadano Alexander Mateus Rodriguez.
- SEGUNDO. ADVERTIR al actor que contra esta decision no procede recurso alguno.
- TERCERO. Ejecutoriada esta decision, ARCHIVESE el expediente D-12325.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.