A- de 2015
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Gabriel Eduardo Mendoza Martelo
✓Claimant Floro Alberto Tunubala Paja Y Otros
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Procedencia excepcional
- Rechazar por extemporánea
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Solicitud de aclaración de la sentencia C-208/07.
Los memorialistas fundamentaron la petición en el hecho de que el Ministerio de Educación se apartó de la ruta establecida por la Corporación en la precitada sentencia.
Al encontrar que no se cumplió con el término establecido para presentar la solicitud, la Sala Plena decide RECHAZARLA por improcedente.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- Primero. RECHAZAR, por improcedente, la solicitud de aclaracion de la Sentencia C-208 de 2007, presentada por los ciudadanos Floro Alberto Tunubala Paja, Carlos Alberto Tumina Paja, Miguel Antonio Tombe y Luis Almendra.
- Segundo. Contra esta providencia no procede recurso alguno.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.