JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)August 6, 2021

A- de 2021

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alberto Rojas Ríos

✓Claimant Sala Plena

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Registro Proyecto De Fallo
  • Se declara de oficio, la nulidad por cuanto se encontraba suspendido su trámite por el estudio de una recusación
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Con el presente auto la Sala Plena de la Corporación decide declarar de oficio la NULIDAD del registro de fallo en el proceso de constitucionalidad de la referencia, realizado el 15 de abril del 2021, por cuanto para la fecha se encontraba suspendido su trámite por el estudio de una recusación presentada dentro del mismo expediente.

Consideró la Sala que lo anterior constituye una irregularidad que afecta el debido proceso y que está prevista expresamente en la ley como una causal de nulidad.

Así mismo, ordena rehacer la actuación procesal declarada nula anteriormente.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. DECLARAR de oficio la nulidad del registro del proyecto fallo en el proceso con numero de radicado D-13937, realizado el 15 de abril de 2021.
  2. Segundo. ORDENAR rehacer la actuacion procesal declarada nula en el numeral anterior.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.