JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)July 26, 2021

A- de 2021

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Paola Andrea Meneses Mosquera

✓Claimant Colpensiones

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Aclaracion Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Procedencia excepcional respecto de frases o conceptos que ofrezcan verdadero motivo de duda
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de aclaración de la Sentencia T-166/21, invocada por el Gerente de Defensa Judicial de Colpensiones.

La Corte considera que no hay lugar a acceder a la anterior petición, toda vez que el memorialista no acreditó legitimidad en la causa por pasiva para pedir la aclaración del precitado fallo.

No obstante lo anterior, en ejercicio de las competencias que le otorga el artículo 285 del Código General del Proceso, la Sala ACLARA oficiosamente su numeral 2º , en el sentido de precisar que la autorización a Colpensiones para deducir los valores pagados a favor del demandante, se refiere a la indemnización sustitutiva de la pensión de vejez, regulada en el artículo 37 de la Ley 100 del año 1993.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. ACLARAR oficiosamente el numeral 2o de la sentencia T-166 de 2021, en el sentido de precisar que la autorizacion a Colpensiones para deducir los valores pagados a favor del demandante, se refiere a la indemnizacion sustitutiva de la pension de vejez, regulada en el articulo 37 de la Ley 100 del ano 1993.
  2. Segundo. Por Secretaria General, COMUNICAR a las partes del proceso de tutela la decision adoptada en esta providencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.