JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)December 6, 2006

A- de 2006

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Clara Inés Vargas Hernández

✓Claimant Mabel Carolina Vargas Hernandez

✓
Topic · hard data
Solicitud De Nulidad De La Sentencia C-355 De 2006 Por Considerar Que Se Ha Generado A Partir De La Sentencia, La Causal De Nulidad De Que Trata El Articulo 29 De La Constitucion Nacional Por Violacion Al Debido Proceso. El Termino Para Presentar Solicitudes De Nulidad Contra Las Providencias Pronunciadas Por La Corte Constitucional Es De Tres Dias Contados A Partir De Su Notificacion. Rechazada Por Extemporanea
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Solicitud De Nulidad Sentencia De Constitucionalidad
  • Rechazar por extemporánea
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional,
  2. RESUELVE
  3. RECHAZAR por extemporanea la solicitud de nulidad presentada por la ciudadana Mabel Carolina Vargas Hernandez contra la sentencia C-355 de mayo 10 de 2006.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
✓
Alvaro Tafur Galvis
Magistrado
Read dissent
✓
Clara Ines Vargas Hernandez
Magistrado
✓
Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto
Magistrado
✓
Jaime Araujo Rentería
Magistrado
✓
Jaime Córdoba Triviño
Impedido
✓
Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa
Magistrado
✓
Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra
Magistrado
Read dissent
✓
Nilson Pinilla Pinilla
Magistrado
✓
Rodrigo Escobar Gil
Magistrado
Read dissent
Separate opinions — text available3
DissentAlvaro Tafur GalvisDissentRodrigo Escobar GilDissentMarco Gerardo Monroy Cabra
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
← cites 2cited by 1 →A. 361/06C-355/06 — Aborto. Casos En Que No Constituye Delito · cited 265 timesC-355/062006A. 149/05 — Solicitudes De Nulidad De La Sentencia C-523 De 2005. Carácter Excepcional De La Nulidad De Las Sentencias Proferidas Por La Corte Constituc · cited 6 timesA. 149/052005A. 1342/24A. 1342/242024
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites2
Cited by1

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.