A- de 2006
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Clara Inés Vargas Hernández
✓Claimant Ilva Myriam Hoyos Castañeda
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Diferencias entre opinar y juzgar
- Alcance de la causal "haber conceptuado sobre la constitucionalidad de la disposición acusada"
- Diferencias entre opinar sobre un asunto relevante y haber conceptuado sobre la constitucionalidad de la disposición acusada
- Causales
- Aplicación
- No existencia en sentido estricto de partes con pretensiones opuestas
- Separación del conocimiento del asunto por declaración en radio
- Impertinencia
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- En merito de lo expuesto, la Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional,
- RESUELVE
- Separar al Magistrado Jaime Araujo Renteria del conocimiento de las solicitudes de nulidad propuestas por varios ciudadanos contra la sentencia C-355 de 2006.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.