JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)November 20, 2008

A- de 2008

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Nilson Elías Pinilla Pinilla

✓Claimant Oscar Orlando García Díaz Vs. Banco Agrario De Colombia

✓
Topic · hard data
Incidente De Desacato De La Sentencia T-358/08. Se Resaltó Que, De Manera General, Corresponde Al Juez De Primera Instanciavelar Por El Cumplimiento Del Respectivo Fallo De Tutela. Por Ello, Se Resolvió Rechazar Por Improcedente Por Carencia De Competencia
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Corte Constitucional
  • Denegación de apertura de incidente de desacato con ocasión de las órdenes impartidas en la Sentencia T-358 de 2008
Cumplimiento Fallo De Tutela
  • Corresponde al juez de primera instancia
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. Primero. RECHAZAR por improcedente la solicitud de iniciar incidente de desacato, promovida a nombre de Oscar Orlando García Díaz.
  2. Segundo. REMITIR al Juzgado
  3. Segundo. de Familia de Neiva, la solicitud de abrir el incidente de desacato frente a la sentencia T-358 de 2008, para que determine lo que estime pertinente.
  4. Tercero. INFORMAR al solicitante que el Juzgado competente para conocer el incidente de desacato de la sentencia T-358 de abril 17 de 2008, es el
  5. Segundo. de Familia de Neiva.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.