JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)December 2, 2009

A- de 2009

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Nilson Elías Pinilla Pinilla

✓Claimant Andres Velasco Sáenz

✓
Topic · hard data
Recurso De Súplica Contra El Auto De Noviembre 5 De 2009, La Corte Concluye Que El Actor No Presentó El Recurso De Súplica En El Término De Tres Días Siguientes A La Notificación Del Auto De Rechazo De La Demanda, Por Lo Tanto Se Rechaza Por Extemporáneo
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Recurso De Suplica Contra Rechazo Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad
  • Término para interponerlo
  • Incumplimiento de requisitos de certeza y pertinencia
1 topic · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional en ejercicio de sus facultades constitucionales y legales,
  2. RESUELVE
  3. RECHAZAR por extemporaneo el recurso de suplica presentado por el ciudadano Felipe Andres Velasco Saenz contra el auto de noviembre 5 de 2009, proferido por el Magistrado Jorge Ignacio Pretelt Chaljub, mediante el cual resolvio rechazar la demanda formulada contra el numeral 3deg (parcial) del articulo 66 de la Ley 794 de 2003, dentro del expediente D-7918.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.