JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)November 22, 2006

A- de 2006

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Clara Inés Vargas Hernández

✓Claimant Jaime Araujo Renteria

✓
Topic · hard data
Tramite De Incidentes De Nulidad De La Sentencia C-355 De 2006. Recurso De Reposicion Interpuesto Por El Magistrado Jaime Araujo Renteria Contra El Auto Del 8 De Noviembre De 2006 Que Nego La Nulisdad Solicitada Por El Mismo Magistrado. Negar El Recurso Interpuesto
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Corte
  2. RESUELVE
  3. Negar el recurso de reposicion interpuesto por el Magistrado Jaime Araujo Renteria contra el auto de fecha ocho (8) de noviembre del corriente ano, proferido por esta corporacion, y mediante el cual se nego la nulidad solicitada por el mismo Magistrado.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.