JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)November 22, 2006

A- de 2006

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Clara Inés Vargas Hernández

✓Claimant Jaime Araujo Renteria

✓
Topic · hard data
Tramite De Incidentes De Nulidad De La Sentencia C-355 De 2006. Recurso De Reposicion Interpuesto Por El Magistrado Jaime Araujo Renteria Contra El Auto 306 Del 8 De Noviembre De 2006 Que Rechazo La Recusacion Presentada Contra El Magistrado Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra. Rechaza El Recurso Interpuesto
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (23 points)
  1. Rechazar el recurso de reposicion interpuesto por el Magistrado Jaime Araujo Rentaria contra el Auto 306 proferido el ocho (8) de noviembre del corriente ano por esta Corporacion.
  2. Notifiquese.
  3. JAIME CORDOBA TRIVINO
  4. Presidente
  5. IMPEDIMENTO ACEPTADO
  6. JAIME ARAUJO RENTERIA
  7. Magistrado
  8. NO FIRMA
  9. NILSON PINILLA PINILLA
  10. Magistrado
  11. MANUEL JOSE CEPEDA ESPINOSA
  12. Magistrado
  13. RODRIGO ESCOBAR GIL
  14. Magistrado
  15. MARCO GERARDO MONROY CABRA
  16. Magistrado
  17. HUMBERTO ANTONIO SIERRA PORTO
  18. Magistrado
  19. ALVARO TAFUR GALVIS
  20. Magistrado
  21. CLARA INES VARGAS HERNANDEZ
  22. Magistrada
  23. MARTHA VICTORIA SACHICA MENDEZ
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.