JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)May 24, 2018

A- de 2018

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Antonio José Lizarazo Ocampo

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Medidas Provisionales
  • Procedencia según Decreto 2591/91 artículo 7
Corte Constitucional
  • Facultad de adoptar de oficio medidas provisionales
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Con el presente auto se ordena, como medida provisional, al Juzgado Primero Civil del Circuito Especializado en Restitución de Tierras de Santa Marta, suspender el cumplimiento de la sentencia proferida dentro del proceso de restitución y formalización de tierras despojadas o abandonadas forzosamente radicado bajo el número 2015-0008, hasta tanto la Sala de Revisión se pronuncie sobre la acción de tutela de la referencia.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. ORDENAR, como medida provisional, por conducto de la Secretaría General de esta Corporación, al Juzgado
  2. Primero. Civil del Circuito Especializado en Restitución de Tierras de Santa Marta, que suspenda el cumplimiento de la sentencia proferida el 23 de julio de 2015 dentro del proceso de restitución y formalización de tierras despojadas o abandonadas forzosamente radicado bajo el número 2015-0008, adelantado por la familia Sánchez. Lo anterior, hasta tanto esta Sala de Revisión se pronuncie sobre la acción de tutela radicada bajo el número de expediente T-6.658.240.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.