JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)December 6, 2001

A- de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Córdoba Triviño

✓Claimant Harold Rey Vera

✓
Topic · hard data
Solicitud Nulidad Sentencia C-1064/01
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Aclaracion De Voto
  • Condicionamiento de sentencia que se comparte
  • No cambia mayoría
Nulidad Sentencia De Constitucionalidad
  • Razones expresadas en la parte motiva son fundamento del fallo
  • Aclaración de voto que resalta condicionamientos del fallo
  • Adopción por mayoría requerida
3 topics · 6 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se denegó la solicitud elevada por el ciudadano de la referencia para que se declare la nulidad de la Sentencia C-1064/01, porque de la aclaración de voto del Magistrado Álvaro Tafur Galvis se concluye que su intención es resaltar la importancia que tienen los condicionamientos del fallo y no, como lo sugiere el solicitante, apartarse de ellos.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Corte Constitucional, en Sala Plena,
  2. RESUELVE:
  3. DENEGAR la solicitud elevada por el ciudadano Harold Rey Vera, para que se declare la nulidad de la Sentencia C-1064 de 2001.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available2
ConcurrenceManuel José Cepeda EspinosaConcurrenceAlvaro Tafur Galvis
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.