JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)October 29, 2008

A- de 2008

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Araujo Rentería

✓Claimant Ruth Pérez Quiroga

✓
Topic · hard data
Solicitud De Nulidad De La Sentencia T-528 De 2008. Se Resolvió Denegar La Petición De La Referencia
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Nulidad Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Oportunidad y término para presentarla
  • Presupuestos y reglas aplicables
  • Procedencia excepcional por vulneración del debido proceso
Solicitud De Nulidad Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Argumentos esbozados por los peticionarios carecen de sustento jurídico respecto a la decisión adoptada en la sentencia T-528 de 2008
2 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (20 points)
  1. Primero. DENEGAR la solicitud de nulidad de la sentencia T-528 de 2008 dictada por la Sala Primera de Revision de la Corte Constitucional el veintidos (22) de mayo de dos mil ocho (2008).
  2. HUMBERTO ANTONIO SIERRA PORTO
  3. Presidente
  4. JAIME ARAUJO RENTERIA
  5. Magistrado
  6. MANUEL JOSE CEPEDA ESPINOSA
  7. Magistrado
  8. JAIME CORDOBA TRIVINO
  9. Magistrado
  10. RODRIGO ESCOBAR GIL
  11. Magistrado
  12. MARCO GERARDO MONROY CABRA
  13. Magistrado
  14. NILSON PINILLA PINILLA
  15. Magistrado
  16. MAURICIO GONZALEZ CUERVO
  17. Magistrado
  18. CLARA INES VARGAS HERNANDEZ
  19. Magistrada
  20. MARTHA VICTORIA SACHICA MENDEZ
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.