JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)October 22, 2008

A- de 2008

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra

✓Claimant Luis Eduardo Montoya Medina

✓
Topic · hard data
Recurso De Súplica Contra El Auto Del 25 De Septiembre De 2008 Dictado En El Proceso De La Referencia Por El Magistrado Ponente, Doctor Rodrigo Escobar Gil. Se Resolvió Confirmar En Todas Sus Partes El Auto Precitado Mediante El Cual Se Rechazó La Demanda Presentada Por El Ciudadano Luis Eduardo Montoya Medina
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad
  • Etapas de admisión y rechazo se encuentran claramente definidas
  • Rechazo
  • Régimen procedimental de los juicios y actuaciones que deben surtirse ante la Corte Constitucional previsto en el Decreto 2067 de 1991
1 topic · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Unico. CONFIRMAR en todas sus partes, el Auto del 25 de septiembre de 2008, proferido por el despacho del Magistrado Ponente en el proceso D-7415, doctor Rodrigo Escobar Gil, mediante el cual se rechazo la demanda "en lo relacionado con los cargos presentados contra el inciso
  2. primero. (parcial) del articulo 68 de la Ley 1098 de 2006" y presentada por el ciudadano Luis Eduardo Montoya Medina, en contra del articulo 68, parcial, de la Ley 1098 de 2006.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.