JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)December 3, 2012

A- de 2012

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Luis Guillermo Guerrero Pérez

✓Claimant Luis Anibal Cardona

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Accion De Tutela Contra La Gobernacion De Antioquia
  • Rechazar solicitud de aclaración de sentencia T-495/11 por extemporánea
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de Aclaración de la sentencia T-495/11.

El peticionario solicita que se aclare la sentencia de la referencia, exponiendo dificultades en el cumplimiento de la misma.

Indica que la aclaración consiste en precisar que él tiene derecho al pago del retroactivo de los salarios correspondiente.

La Sala decide RECHAZAR la petición de aclaración impetrada, por haber sido presentada de manera extemporánea.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. RESUELVE:
  2. RECHAZAR la petición de aclaración de la sentencia T-495 de 2011, formulada por el señor Luis Aníbal Cardona, por ser extemporánea.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.