A- de 2013
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Alberto Rojas Ríos
✓Claimant Harold Hernan Moreno Cardona
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Carácter rogado
- Rechazar recurso de súplica por falta de claridad, especificidad y suficiencia
- Recurso de súplica
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Recurso de Súplica presentado en contra del auto proferido por el magistrado Jorge Ignacio Pretelt Chaljub para rechazar la demanda de la referencia, por cuanto el escrito de corrección no subsanó la totalidad de las deficiencias descritas en el auto de inadmisión.
La Sala Plena de la Corporación decide CONFIRMAR el auto recurrido.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- En merito de lo expuesto la Sala Plena de la Corporacion en ejercicio competencias,
- RESUELVE:
- CONFIRMAR el auto del cinco (5) de junio de dos mil trece (2013), mediante el cual se rechazo la demanda de inconstitucionalidad contra el articulo 599 (parcial) de la ley 1564 de 2012 "Por medio de la cual se expide el Codigo General del Proceso y se dictan otras disposiciones".
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.