JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)September 1, 2009

A- de 2009

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Nilson Elías Pinilla Pinilla

✓Claimant Luz Dari Guzman

✓
Topic · hard data
Incidente De Desacato A La Sentencia T-062 De 2009, La Sala, Remite El Incidente Al Juzgado De Primera Instancia Para Que Determine Lo Que Estime Pertinente,  Ya Que La Corte Solo Excepcionalmente Conoce De Estos Incidentes.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Cumplimiento Fallo De Tutela
  • Competencia del juez de primera instancia
Corte Constitucional
  • Competencia excepcional para asegurar el cumplimiento del fallo en asuntos de gran trascendencia social
  • No asume solicitud de iniciar incidente de desacato en sentencia T-062/09
Juez
  • Competente hasta que esté completamente restablecido el derecho o eliminadas las causas de la amenaza
3 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. NO ASUMIR la peticion de iniciar incidente de desacato, presentada por la senora Luz Dary Guzman.
  2. Segundo. REMITIR al Juzgado Treinta y Nueve Civil del Circuito de Bogota la solicitud de abrir el incidente de desacato frente a la sentencia T-062 de 2009, para que determine lo que estime pertinente.
  3. Tercero. INFORMAR al solicitante esta decision, por intermedio de la Secretaria General de esta corporacion.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.