JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)December 1, 2005

A- de 2005

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Rodrigo Escobar Gil

✓Claimant Pedro Ignacio Marroquin Bernal Y Otro

✓
Topic · hard data
Solicitud De Aclaracion De La Sentencia T-764/05. Las Sentencias Proferidas Por La Corporacion En Desarrollo De Su Funcion De Revision De Los Fallos De Los Jueces De Tutela No Son Como Regla General Susceptibles De Aclaracion. Carece De Fudamento La Solicitud De Aclaracion. Negada
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Corte Constitucional
  • Incompetencia para el desarrollo de la parte operativa de fallos de revisión sobre acciones de tutela
Solicitud De Aclaracion Fallo De Revision De Tutela
  • Improcedencia para el desarrollo de la parte operativa de fallo de revisión
  • Procedencia sólo respecto de frases o conceptos
  • Reiteración de la improcedencia
2 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. DENEGAR las solicitudes de aclaración de la Sentencia T-764 de 2005, presentadas por el Pedro Ignacio Marroquín y por el representante legal de la Empresa de Telecomunicaciones de Bogotá S.A. ESP.
  2. SEGUNDO. REMITIR la presente actuación al Juzgado 26 Penal Municipal de Bogotá para que haga parte del expediente de tutela respectivo.
  3. TERCERO. Contra este pronunciamiento no procede recurso alguno.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.