JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)November 22, 2011

A- de 2011

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Nilson Elías Pinilla Pinilla

✓Claimant Ciro Antonio Rojas Agudelo·Respondent Sin Información

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Nulidad Contra Sentencias Proferidas Por Salas De Revision
  • Procedencia excepcional
  • Procedencia excepcional por vulneración del debido proceso y cumplimiento de la carga argumentativa de quien la alega
  • Reiteración de jurisprudencia
Nulidad Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Causal por desconocimiento de la jurisprudencia de la Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional
Tramite De Nulidad
  • No es nueva instancia procesal que pueda reabrir debate concluido
4 topics · 6 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Nulidad Sentencia.

A juicio del peticionario de la nulidad, la Sala Sexta de Revisión de la Corte Constitucional, al emitir la sentencia T-043/10modificó sustantivamente el precedente del pleno de la Corporación en cuanto a los alcances del derecho al fuero sindical.

La Sala Plena encuentra que la solicitud de nulidad impetrada no cumple las exigencias mínimas formales de señalar y sustentar debidamente la causal invocada.

DENEGADA.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. DENEGAR la nulidad de la sentencia T-043 de 2010, proferida en febrero 2 de 2010 por la Sala Sexta de Revision de Tutelas.
  2. Segundo. Contra esta providencia no procede recurso alguno.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.