A- de 2019
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Antonio José Lizarazo Ocampo
✓Claimant Jaime Plata Ramos
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Improcedencia por cuanto el recurso de súplica no presenta argumentos que desvirtúen las razones constitutivas del rechazo de la demanda
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Recurso de súplica.
El rechazo de la demanda se dio porque los cargos formulados no cumplieron con los requisitos dispuestos en el artículo 2 del Decreto 2067 de 1991.
La Sala Plena de la Corporación decidió negar el recurso y CONFIRMAR el auto recurrido.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- RESUELVE
- PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR el auto del 10 de abril de 2019, dictado por el magistrado sustanciador Alejandro Linares Cantillo, por medio del cual rechazo la demanda, identificada con el numero de radicacion D-13113.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.