JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)October 23, 2013

A- de 2013

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jorge Iván Palacio Palacio

✓Claimant Luis Fernando Jaramillo Duque

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad
  • Activación por ciudadano
  • Rechazo cuando recae sobre normas amparadas en sentencias que hicieron tránsito a cosa juzgada
  • Corrección
  • Cumplimiento de requisitos formales
Accion Publica De Inconstitucionalidad
  • Carácter rogado de la competencia
Cosa Juzgada Constitucional
  • Carácter definitivo
Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad Frente A Funciones Del Contralor General
  • Rechazar recurso de súplica por existir cosa juzgada mediante sentencia C-713/08
9 topics · 13 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Recurso de Súplica contra el auto del 27 de septiembre de 2012 mediante el cual se rechazó la demanda de la referencia por haber hecho tránsito a cosa juzgada constitucional, en virtud del examen de constitucionalidad realizado por la Corte en la sentencia C-713/08..

Luego del análisis de rigor Sala Plena decide CONFIRMAR el auto recurrido.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional,
  2. RESUELVE:
  3. CONFIRMAR el Auto del 27 de septiembre de 2013, proferido por el magistrado Gabriel Eduardo Mendoza Martelo, por medio del cual se rechazo la demanda de inconstitucionalidad presentada contra el articulo 6deg (parcial) de la Ley 270 de 1996, "Estatutaria de la Administracion de Justicia", modificado por el articulo 2deg de la Ley 1285 de 2009.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.