JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)September 19, 2008

A- de 2008

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

✓Claimant Diego Muñoz Tamayo

✓
Topic · hard data
Solicitud De Aclaracion De La Sentencia T-760 De 2008. Procedencia De Las Solicitudes De Aclaracion. Concluir Que Los Comites Tecnico Cientificos Cumplen Con Sus Responsabilidades Atinentes Al Respeto Del Derecho A La Salud Con El Mero Tramite Administrativo De La Solicitud De Autorizacion De Un Servicio Medico No Pos, Llevaria A Que Los Mismos Puedan Negar Todos Los Servicios Solicitados, Despues De Un Tramite Oportuno. Por Lo Anterior, Para Esta Sala El Numeral Controvertido Y La Parte Motiva De La Sentencia De La Referencia Son Claros Y Precisos En Relacion Con Las Condiciones Para Que Proceda El Reembolso Del 100% Del Servicio Medico No Pos Autorizado, Por Lo Que No Se Aclarara La Sentencia. Denegada
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Solicitud De Aclaración De Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Denegación en el caso del numeral vigésimo tercero y la parte motiva de la sentencia T-760 de 2008 por ser claros y precisos en cuanto a las condiciones para que proceda el reembolso del 100% de
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. Denegar la solicitud de aclaración de la sentencia T-760 de 2008 presentada por Diego Muñoz Tamayo, en calidad de apoderado de EPS Sanitas SA.
  2. Segundo. INFORMAR al peticionario que contra el presente auto no procede recurso alguno.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
✓
Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa
Reporting justice
✓
Jaime Córdoba Triviño
Magistrado
✓
Rodrigo Escobar Gil
Magistrado
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
← cites 0cited by 1 →A. 241/08T-837/08 · cited 8 timesT-837/082008
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by1

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.