Order (Auto)November 17, 2005

A- de 2005

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

✓Claimant Miguel Angel Sossa Vellojin

✓

Topic · hard data

Incidente De Desacato De La Sentencia T-491/01 Promovido Ante La Corte Constitucional. De Conformidad Con Los Dispuesto En El Articulo 52 Del Decreto 2591 De 1991, Corresponde Al Juez De Primera Instancia Dentro De Los Procesos De Tutela Conocer De Los Incidentes De Desacato De Sus Ordenes Y Adoptar Las Medidas A Que Haya Lugar. Rechazar Por Improcedente La Solicitud

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Incidente De Desacato

Improcedencia por ser competencia de Juez Promiscuo de Familia

Juez De Primera Instancia

Competencia para conocer incidente de desacato

2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

Primero. RECHAZAR por improcedente la solicitud de iniciar incidente de desacato promovida por Miguel Ángel Sossa Vellojín.
Segundo. INFORMAR a Miguel Ángel Sossa Vellojín que el juez competente para conocer del incidente de desacato de la sentencia T-491 de 2001 es el Juez Promiscuo de Familia de Lorica.
Comuníquese,

Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data

✓

Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

Reporting justice

✓

Jaime Córdoba Triviño

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it

constitutional review unification tutela

Cites1

T-491/01Derecho De Peticion Pension De Jubilacion Ybono Pensional. No Reconocimiento De Pension De Jubilacion Aduciendo La No Emision Del Bono Pensional Por Parte De Otra Entidad. Concedida.

Cited by0

No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.