JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)September 6, 2006

A- de 2006

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto

✓Claimant Herminsul Sinisterra Santana Contra El Periodico Amazonía Sin Fronteras.

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Entre El Juzgado Primero Civil Del Circuito De Bogotá Y El Juzgado Penal Del Circuito De Leticia Amazonas. Ordena Remitir El Proceso Al Juzgado Penal Del Circuito De Leticia Amazonas.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Competencia de la Corte Suprema de Justicia
  • Competencia de la Corte Suprema de Justicia como superior jerárquico común
Criterio Funcional En Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Juez de superior e inferior jerarquía hace parte de la jurisdicción constitucional
Corte Constitucional
  • Conocimiento directo de conflicto de competencia en cabeza de otra autoridad judicial para garantizar derechos fundamentales
  • Competencia residual para dirimir conflictos de competencia
Competencia A Prevención En Tutela
  • Lugar donde ocurrió amenaza o vulneración de derechos fundamentales o donde se produjeron sus efectos
7 topics · 9 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Corte Constitucional, en Sala Plena
  2. RESUELVE:
  3. Remitase el expediente contentivo de la accion de tutela propuesta por el ciudadano Herminsul Sinisterra Santana contra el Periodico Amazonia Sin Fronteras, al Juzgado Penal del Circuito de Leticia (Amazonas) para que le de tramite y decida en forma inmediata.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.