JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)August 30, 2006

A- de 2006

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Clara Inés Vargas Hernández

✓Claimant Gina Marcela Bernal Medina Vs. Jardines De Paz S.A. Y Otros

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Entre El Tribunal Administrativo Del Quindio Y El Juzgado Primero Civil Municipal De Calarca –Quindio. Ordena Remitir El Expediente Al Tribunal Administrativo Del Quindio
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela
  • Decreto 1382 de 2000 no establece competencia sino reglas de simple reparto
  • Responsabilidad de entidades demandadas debe ser resuelta en el fallo que ponga fin a la primera instancia
Accion De Tutela Contra Autoridad Publica Del Orden Nacional
  • Competencia del Tribunal Superior, Administrativo y Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura
Accion De Tutela Contra Autoridades De Diferente Nivel
  • Competencia del juez de mayor jerarquía
Decreto Reglamentario De Competencia Para Reparto De Accion De Tutela
  • Aplicación
  • Reglas para el trámite administrativo de reparto
Reparto De Accion De Tutela Al Juez De Mayor Jerarquia
  • Caso en que se interpuso contra un particular y dos entidades públicas de diferente nivel y debía conocer Tribunal Administrativo
Jurisdiccion Constitucional
  • No corresponde a quienes la ejercen determinar a priori contra quienes se dirige la acción de tutela
7 topics · 9 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. RESUELVE:
  2. REMITIR el expediente al Tribunal Administrativo del Quindio para que adelante la correspondiente actuacion judicial.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.