JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)November 17, 2005

A- de 2005

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto

✓Claimant Jesús Nelson Prieto Guerrero

✓
Topic · hard data
Ley 600 De 2000 Articulo 337 (Parcial) Y Ley 906 De 2004 Articulo 394 (Parcial). Impedimento Del Procurador General De La Nacion Encargado Para Rendir Concepto Respecto Del Proceso De La Referencia. Aceptar El Impedimento Y Ordena Remitir Expediente Para Designación De Funcionario Que Rinda Concepto
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Impedimento Del Procurador General De La Nacion
  • Participación en la subcomisión redactora de la norma acusada
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. ACEPTAR el impedimento manifestado por el senor Procurador Encargado, doctor Carlos Arturo Gomez Pavajeau para emitir concepto de fondo en relacion con la demanda de inconstitucionalidad que obra en el expediente D-6007, por las razones expuestas.
  2. Segundo. ORDENAR que una vez levantada la suspension, por Secretaria General de la Corte Constitucional se REMITA el expediente al senor Procurador General de la Nacion, para que proceda con la designacion del funcionario que habra de rendir, dentro del termino que aun resta, el concepto de fondo a que hace referencia el articulo 278-5 de la Constitucion.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.