JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)October 15, 2002

A- de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Luis Eduardo Montealegre Lynett

✓Claimant Javier Alejandro Acevedo

✓
Topic · hard data
Recurso De Suplica Contra Auto Que Rechaza Demanda
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se confirmó el auto suplicado, por el cual se rechazó la demanda de inconstitucionalidad interpuesta por los ciudadanos de la referencia contra el numeral 2 (parcial) del Art. 112 de la Ley 270 de 1996 “Estatutaria de la Administración de Justicia”, toda vez que teniendo en cuenta que el inciso 4o. del Art. 6o. del Decreto 2067 de 1991 dispone que: "Se rechazarán las demandas que recaigan sobre normas amparadas por una sentencia que hubiere hecho tránsito a cosa juzgada", y que en el presente asunto ha operado el fenómeno de la cosa juzgada constitucional, de conformidad con lo dispuesto por los Arts. 243 de la Constitución Política y 46 del Decreto 2067 de 1991, no hay lugar a emitir un nuevo pronunciamiento sobre las normas acusadas.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. RESUELVE:
  2. CONFIRMAR el auto suplicado, por el cual se rechazo la demanda de inconstitucionalidad interpuesta por los ciudadanos Alirio Uribe Munoz y Javier Alejandro Acevedo contra el numeral 2 (parcial) del articulo 112 de la Ley 270 de 1996 "Estatutaria de la Administracion de Justicia".
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.