JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)September 17, 2008

A- de 2008

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra

✓Claimant Cesar Augusto Rodríguez Ramírez Vs. Universidad Nacional De Colombia

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Suscitado Entre El Consejo Seccional De La Judicatura De Antioquia, Sala Jurisdiccional Disciplinaria Y El Juzgado Sexto Civil Del Circuto De Medellín. Se Resolvió Remitir El Expediente Contentivo De La Acción De Tutela De La Referencia Al Consejo Seccional De La Judicatura De Antioquia, Sala Jurisdiccional Disciplinaria, Para Que Adelante La Correspondiente Actuación Judicial.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Accion De Tutela Conttra La Universidad Nacional
  • Competencia Tribunales Superiores de Distrito Judicial, Administrativos o Consejos Seccionales de la Judicatura
Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Competencia Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura
Universidad Nacional
  • Naturaleza jurídica
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. PRIMERO. REMITIR el expediente contentivo de la accion de tutela interpuesta por Cesar Augusto Rodriguez Ramirez contra la Universidad Nacional de Colombia, al Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura de Antioquia, Sala Jurisdiccional Disciplinaria, para que adelante la correspondiente actuacion judicial.
  2. SEGUNDO. Por Secretaria General COMUNIQUESE al Juzgado
  3. Sexto. Civil del Circuito de Medellin, la decision adoptada en esta providencia, con el fin de que tengan conocimiento sobre lo aqui resuelto por la Corte Constitucional en relacion con el conflicto de competencia.
  4. Comuniquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.