A- de 2011
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Juan Carlos Henao Pérez
✓Claimant Blanca Edila Palacios Alban·Respondent Sin Información
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Procedencia dentro del término de ejecutoria, de oficio o a solicitud de parte respecto de conceptos o frases contenidas en la parte resolutiva o que influyan en ella
- Rechazar solicitud de adición de sentencia T-210/11
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Solicitud de Aclaración y Adición Sentencia.
La memorialista reclama que en la parte resolutiva de la sentencia T-210/11, se establezca cómo debe ser liquidada la prestación que se le reconoce y se diga explícitamente si el amparo fue otorgado de manera definitiva o transitoria.
Se RECHAZA la solicitud impetrada por la accionante.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- Primero. RECHAZAR la solicitud de adicion de la sentencia T-210 de 2011 proferida por la Sala Tercera de Revision, presentada por la senora Blanca Edila Palacios Alban.
- Segundo. Comuniquese la presente providencia a la peticionaria, con la advertencia que contra esta decision no procede ningun recurso.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.