A- de 2011
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice María Victoria Calle Correa
✓Claimant Mauricio Rodrigez Faustino
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Rechazar solicitud de nulidad de sentencia T-726/05 por extemporánea
- Reiteración de jurisprudencia
- Requisitos formales y materiales de procedencia
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Solicitud de nulidad de la Sentencia T-726/05.
El accionante pidió la declaratoria de nulidad parcial del referido fallo, específicamente del numeral segundo de la parte resolutiva, en el aparte que ordena su reintegro “hasta la terminación definitiva de la existencia jurídica de la empresa”.
Encontró la Corporación que la nulidad invocada no cumple con el presupuesto formal de oportunidad y, por ello, decidió RECHAZARLA por resultar improcedente.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- Primero. RECHAZAR por improcedente la solicitud de nulidad de la Sentencia T-726 de 2005,15 proferida por la Sala Tercera de Revisión de la Corte Constitucional.
- Segundo. Comuníquese la presente providencia al peticionario, informándole que contra ella no procede recurso alguno.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.