JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)April 11, 2019

A- de 2019

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Luis Guillermo Guerrero Pérez

✓Claimant Interconexion Electrica S.A. E.S.P.

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Juez De Tutela De Primera Instancia
  • Competencia para estudiar y resolver tanto el trámite de cumplimiento como el incidente de desacato
Corte Constitucional
  • Ámbito de competencia delimitado en la Constitución
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitudes formuladas por la empresa Interconexión Eléctrica S.A.

E.S.P. en relación con la Sentencia T-142/11, específicamente sobre la terminación de los procesos abreviados de imposición de servidumbre de conducción eléctrica promovidos por esa compañía en contra de una persona natural y otra jurídica.

La Corte declara IMPROCEDENTES las peticiones mencionadas.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. Por las razones expuestas en esta providencia, declarar IMPROCEDENTES las solicitudes formuladas por el señor Juan Felipe Rendón Álvarez, en representación de la empresa de servicios públicos Interconexión Eléctrica S.A. E.S.P.
  2. SEGUNDO. ORDENAR que, por Secretaría General, se comunique el contenido de esta providencia al peticionario y se le advierta que contra esta decisión no procede ningún recurso.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.