A- de 2017
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Aquiles Arrieta Gómez
✓Claimant Rosalba Blanco Yacuna
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Recurso de súplica interpuesto contra el auto que rechazó la demanda de la referencia, por manifiesta falta de competencia.
Tras CONFIRMAR la providencia recurrida reitera la Sala que, cuando una aplicación normativa que realice un operador no acarrea problemas de interpretación constitucionales, la Corte es incompetente para conocer demandas de inexequibilidad contra sentencias judiciales.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- Primero. CONFIRMAR en todas sus partes el Auto del 17 de marzo de 2017, proferido por el despacho del Magistrado Ponente en el proceso D-11976, doctor Ivan Escruceria Mayolo, mediante el cual se rechazo la demanda presentada por la ciudadana Rosalba Blanco Yacuna contra la sentencia del 24 de enero de 2013 proferida por el Juzgado
- Primero. Civil Municipal de Villavicencio
- Segundo. ARCHIVESE el expediente.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.