A- de 2014
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Nilson Elías Pinilla Pinilla
✓Claimant Alirio Barrios Bravo
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Negar por cuanto se pretende reabrir debate jurídico
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Solicitud de nulidad de la sentencia T-547/11.
La Corte precisa que no le asiste al interesado en su reproche y que, además, la excepcional procedencia del incidente de nulidad contra las sentencias de revisión de tutela no puede conducir a que, producto de la inconformidad de quien no resultó favorecido con lo resuelto en derecho por alguna de las Salas de Revisión de la Corte Constitucional, pretenda reabrir el debate probatorio, pues como lo ha establecido la jurisprudencia, si la acción de amparo no es una instancia adicional, mucho menos puede serlo el incidente de nulidad.
SE NIEGA.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- Primero. DENEGAR la solicitud de nulidad de la sentencia T-547 de julio 7 de 2011, proferida por la Sala Sexta de Revision de esta corporacion.
- Segundo. Contra esta providencia no procede recurso alguno.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.