JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)July 5, 2014

A- de 2014

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Nilson Elías Pinilla Pinilla

✓Claimant Jefe De La Oficina Juridica De La Autoridad Nacional De Licencias Ambientales

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Aclaracion Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Reiteración de improcedencia
  • Procedencia por presentación dentro del término de ejecutoria
  • Procedencia respecto de conceptos o frases contenidas en la parte resolutiva o que influyan en ella
Solicitud De Aclaración De Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Procedencia excepcional del artículo 309 del CPC en la actualidad artículo 285 del Código General del Proceso
3 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de Aclaración de la sentencia T-154/13.

La Sala estima que la aclaración no es procedente, porque le resulta evidente que el peticionario pretende que la Corporación se pronuncie más allá de sus funciones, lo cual claramente le está vedado.

NO SE ACCEDE a lo solicitado.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (9 points)
  1. Primero. NO ACCEDER a la solicitud de aclaracion de la sentencia T-154 proferida por la Sala Sexta de Revision en marzo 21 de 2013.
  2. Segundo. INFORMAR al interesado que contra el presente auto no procede recurso alguno.
  3. NILSON PINILLA PINILLA
  4. Magistrado
  5. JORGE IGNACIO PRETELT CHALJUB
  6. Magistrado
  7. ALBERTO ROJAS RIOS
  8. Magistrado
  9. MARTHA VICTORIA SACHICA DE MONCALEANO
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.