JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)June 4, 2012

A- de 2012

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice María Victoria Calle Correa

✓Claimant Alvaro Vasquez Melo·Respondent Sin Información

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Condena Proferida Por La Justicia Penal
  • Produce la suspensión de determinados derechos y restricción de otros
Corte Constitucional
  • Competencia para revisar fallos de tutela
Condena Penal
  • No constituye perjuicio irremediable
4 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de medida provisional.

El memorialista solicitó la adopción de una medida provisional consistente en la suspensión de los efectos de la sentencia proferida por la Sala de Casación Penal de la Corte Suprema de Justicia, mediante la cual fue declarado responsable del delito de falsedad ideológica en documento público y condenado a la pena de 64 meses de prisión e inhabilitado para el ejercicio de funciones públicas por 80 meses.

La Sala considera que la medida provisional solicitada resulta improcedente y en tal sentido NO LA CONCEDE.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (22 points)
  1. Primero. NO CONCEDER la medida provisional solicitada por el señor Álvaro Vásquez Melo en el trámite de la referencia.
  2. Comuníquese,
  3. GABRIEL EDUARDO MENDOZA MARTELO
  4. Presidente
  5. MARIA VICTORIA CALLE CORREA
  6. Magistrada
  7. ADRIANA MARIA GUILLEN ARANGO
  8. Magistrada (E)
  9. MAURICIO GONZALEZ CUERVO
  10. Magistrado
  11. Ausente con permiso
  12. JORGE IVAN PALACIO PALACIO
  13. Magistrado
  14. NILSON PINILLA PINILLA
  15. Magistrado
  16. JORGE IGNACIO PRETELT CHALJUB
  17. Magistrado
  18. HUMBERTO ANTONIO SIERRA PORTO
  19. Magistrado
  20. LUIS ERNESTO VARGAS SILVA
  21. Magistrado
  22. MARTHA VICTORIA SACHICA MENDEZ
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.