A- de 2008
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa
✓Claimant Jaime Arlex Diaz Henao
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Aplicación del artículo 25 del decreto 2067 de 1991
- Resolución en la misma providencia
- Causales de impedimento
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
See the operative part (3 points)
- Primero. ACEPTAR el impedimento presentado por el senor Procurador General de la Nacion, doctor Edgardo Jose Maya Villazon, para emitir concepto de fondo respecto de la constitucionalidad de la norma acusada de la Ley 734 de 2002.
- Segundo. ACEPTAR el impedimento presentado por el senor Viceprocurador General de la Nacion, doctor Carlos Arturo Gomez Pavajeau, para emitir concepto de fondo respecto de la constitucionalidad de la norma acusada de la Ley 734 de 2002.
- Tercero. ORDENAR por Secretaria General, que una vez levantada la suspension, se REMITA el expediente al despacho del senor Procurador General de la Nacion para que proceda a la designacion del funcionario que habra de rendir en el tiempo restante, el concepto de fondo a que hace referencia el articulo 278-5 de la Carta.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.