JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)October 5, 2004

A- de 2004

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Clara Inés Vargas Hernández

✓Claimant Alfonso Clavijo González

✓
Topic · hard data
Solicitud De Aclaración Y/O Adición De La Sentencia C-757 De 2004.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Sentencia En Proceso De Constitucionalidad
  • Incompetencia de la Corte Constitucional para aclaración o adición
  • No revocación ni reforma
1 topic · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se denegó la solicitud de aclaración y adición presentada por el ciudadano de la referencia en relación con la Sentencia C-757/04, toda vez que esta Corporación ha argumentado su falta de competencia para conocer solicitudes de aclaración y adición presentadas por los ciudadanos contra las sentencias proferidas en ejercicio del control de constitucionalidad.

Contra esta providencia no procede recurso alguno.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. DENEGAR la solicitud de aclaracion y adicion presentada por el ciudadano Alfonso Clavijo Gonzalez, en relacion con la sentencia C-757 de 2004.
  2. Segundo. Contra esta providencia no procede recurso alguno.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.