A- de 2004
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa
✓Claimant Álvaro Rafael Pacheco Pimiento·Respondent Tribunal Superior De Bogotá, Sala Laboral
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Alcance
- Entrega de telegrama en vivienda del actor
- Fue realizada en debida forma
- Medios
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Se rechazó la solicitud de nulidad presentada por el ciudadano de la referencia contra el auto de Sala Plena del día ocho de junio de 2004 que denegó la solicitud de nulidad de la Sentencia T-057/04 proferida por la Sala Tercera de Revisión, toda vez que los argumentos del actor acerca de la indebida notificación de la providencia no son concluyentes.
Contra el presente auto no procede recurso alguno.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- Primero. RECHAZAR la solicitud de nulidad presentada por el senor Alvaro Rafael Pacheco Pimiento contra el auto de Sala Plena del dia ocho (8) de junio de 2004.
- Segundo. Contra la presente providencia no procede recurso alguno.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.