A- de 2017
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Alejandro Linares Cantillo
✓Claimant Miguel Santos Garcia Ramirez
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Rechazar de plano, por cuanto hizo tránsito a cosa juzgada
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Solicitud de revisión de la Sentencia T-078/14.
Considera la Sala Plena que los argumentos y pretensiones formulados por el peticionario van encaminados a que la Corte declare la nulidad de la precitada providencia y, en consecuencia, conceda el amparo de los derechos fundamentales cuya protección invocó en la demanda de tutela.
Como quiera que resulta evidente que el memorialista pretende reabrir un debate jurídico que fue decidido en diversas oportunidades por la Corporación, la Sala decide RECHZAR la solicitud de revisión interpuesta.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- En merito de lo expuesto, la Sala Plena
- RESUELVE
- RECHAZAR DE PLANO la solicitud de revision interpuesta contra la sentencia T-078 de 2014, por el senor Miguel Santos Garcia Ramirez.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.