JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)March 30, 2001

A- de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

✓Claimant Sierra Gomez Rodolfo·Respondent Dansocial

✓
Topic · hard data
Solicitud Nulidad Por Conflicto De Competencia
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se declaró la nulidad de todo lo actuado en la acción de tutela promovida por el ciudadano de la referencia en contra del Director Nacional del Departamento Nacional de Economía Solidaria, DANSOCIAL, a partir del auto proferido por el Juez 25 Penal del Circuito de Bogotá, D.C., toda vez que el citado despacho judicial aplicó lo dispuesto en el Art. 1 del Decreto 1382 de 2000, norma contraria a la Constitución.

En consecuencia, se ordenó remitir el expediente al juzgado competente para que realice el trámite que corresponda conforme a la ley.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. DECLARAR la nulidad de todo lo actuado en la accion de tutela promovida por el senor Rodolfo Sierra Gomez, en contra del Director Nacional del Departamento Nacional de Economia Solidaria, DANSOCIAL, Dr. Manuel Augusto Romero Cruz o quien haga sus veces a partir del auto del 25 de agosto de 2000 proferido por el Juez 25 Penal del Circuito de Bogota, D.C.
  2. Segundo. REMITASE el expediente al Juez 25 Penal del Circuito de Bogota, D.C. para que, de forma inmediata se le imprima a esta accion de tutela el tramite que corresponda conforme a la Ley.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.