JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)April 24, 2006

A- de 2006

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alfredo Beltrán Sierra

✓Claimant Edgar Saavedra Rojas

✓
Topic · hard data
Recurso De Suplica Contra El Auto De 17 De Marzo De 2006 De Rechazo De La Demanda Proferido Por El Magistrado Jaime Araujo Renteria. Deniega El Recuso De Suplica
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Recurso De Suplica Contra Rechazo Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad
  • Negado porque acusación se fundamenta en omisión legislativa absoluta
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional,
  2. RESUELVE:
  3. Denegar el recurso de suplica interpuesto por el ciudadano Edgar Saavedra Rojas, contra el auto de 17 de marzo de 2006, mediante el cual se rechazo la demanda por el presentada con el ciudadano Mauricio Pava Lugo para que se declare la inexequibilidad de los articulos 175 y 267 (parcial) de la Ley 906 de 2004.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.