JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)May 23, 2007

A- de 2007

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

✓Claimant Ecopetrol Vs. Comité De Reclamos Uso Ecopetrol El Centro-Provincia

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Entre El Juzgado Noveno Civil Del Circuito De Bucaramanga Y El Tribunal Administrativo De Santander. Ordena A La Sala Laboral Del Tribunal Superior Del Distrito Judicial De Bucaramanga Iniciar El Tramite De La Accion De Tutela
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Tribunal Superior
  • Competencia funcional de salas laborales para conocer recursos de anulación contra laudos en arbitramento voluntario
Conflicto Negativo De Competencia
  • Decisiones judiciales adolecen de coherencia constitucional y argumentación normativa
Convencion Colectiva De Trabajo
  • Comité de Reclamos actúa como Tribunal de arbitramento voluntario cuyos laudos son pasibles del recurso de anulación
Decreto Reglamentario De Competencia Para Reparto De Accion De Tutela
  • Interpretación
  • Determina la autoridad judicial que debe asumir sin mayores dilaciones
6 topics · 6 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional,
  2. RESUELVE
  3. ORDENAR a la Sala Laboral del Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Bucaramanga que, de forma inmediata, inicie el tramite de la accion de tutela de la referencia y profiera la decision de instancia que corresponda, conforme a las previsiones del articulo 86 de la Constitucion Politica y del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.