A- de 2013
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Luis Ernesto Vargas Silva
✓Claimant Edgar Alay Olaya Diaz
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Recurso de súplica
- Rechazar recurso de súplica por falta de pertinencia
- Carácter excepcional y estricto
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Recurso de súplica formulado contra el auto del 20 de mayo de 2013, mediante el cual se rechazó la demanda de la referencia en virtud de que el escrito subsanatorio no solucionó los yerros identificados en el auto de inadmisión.
La Sala Plena decide CONFIRMAR el auto recurrido.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR el auto del 20 de mayo de 2013, proferido por el magistrado Alberto Rojas Rios, que rechazo la demanda de inconstitucionalidad de la referencia, formulada por el ciudadano Olaya Diaz.
- SEGUNDO. A traves de la Secretaria General de la Corte, comuniquese el contenido de esta decision al recurrente, indicandole que contra esta no procede recurso alguno.
- TERCERO. Ejecutoriada esta decision, archivese el expediente.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.